Questioning the Behavioral Assumption Underlying Wigmorean Absolutism in the Law of Evidentiary Privileges

Authors

  • Edward J. Imwinkelried

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2003.16

Abstract

From society’s perspective, the rules governing privileged communications such as those between a client and his or her attorney are arguably the most important doctrines in evidence law. Most evidentiary doctrines relate to the court’s institutional concerns. By way of example, the best evidence and hearsay rules are largely designed to enhance the reliability of the evidence on which the trier of fact bases his or her findings. The primary impact of these rules is on the in-court behavior of witnesses, attorneys, and judges.

Downloads

Published

2003-04-26

How to Cite

Imwinkelried, Edward J. 2003. “Questioning the Behavioral Assumption Underlying Wigmorean Absolutism in the Law of Evidentiary Privileges”. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 65 (2). https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2003.16.

Issue

Section

Articles