Protecting Pregnant Pennsylvanians: Public Funding of Crisis Pregnancy Centers

Authors

  • Meagan McElroy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2015.334

Abstract

Following a brief overview of the history of CPCs in the United States and the “abortion alternatives” program in Pennsylvania, this Note examines possible legal claims in terms of legal standards and likelihood of success. The results of a Right to Know (“RTK”) request directed toward the Pennsylvania DPW, including both what the DPW offered to produce and what it refused to produce, will supplement this evaluation of possible legal claims. This Note also proposes Public policy recommendations aimed at eliminating the DPW’s liability for these claims in the interest of preventing abusive tactics by CPCs and conserving public funds. Finally, this Note compares the relative benefits and disadvantages of legislative and regulatory reform to those of litigation. Either litigative or legislative action is necessary to prevent publically funded CPCs from inflicting further harm on pregnant Pennsylvanians.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-27

How to Cite

McElroy, Meagan. 2015. “Protecting Pregnant Pennsylvanians: Public Funding of Crisis Pregnancy Centers”. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 76 (3). https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2015.334.

Issue

Section

Note