Competition Policy And Organizational Fragmentation In Health Care

Authors

  • Thomas (Tim) Greaney

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2009.135

Abstract

Once upon a time . . . and a very good time it was, advocates for marketbased approaches to health policy had a coherent story to tell. Cost and quality would remain suboptimal as long as fee-for-service medicine persisted and the myriad market imperfections that impede efficiency went unchecked. However, things could be righted by adopting principles associated with managed care, together with pursuing sensible antitrust enforcement and government deregulation to clear away the private and regulatory underbrush obstructing market forces. Economic theorists and policy experts agreed that these steps would effectively address information, agency, and moral hazard problems and begin to glue together the pieces of our fragmented delivery system. And, for a while, things seemed to work out as promised. Providers began to reorganize into firms and other integrating arrangements and health insurers adopted financial and contractual measures designed to align provider incentives with consumer needs. Regulators directed policies at removing obstacles to competition and antitrust enforcers sought to encourage efficient consolidation while blocking cartels and provider oligopolies. Spiraling costs leveled off for a while and both payment systems and provider organizations began to adapt to market forces.

Downloads

Published

2009-04-26

How to Cite

Greaney, Thomas (Tim). 2009. “Competition Policy And Organizational Fragmentation In Health Care”. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 71 (2). https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2009.135.

Issue

Section

Articles