Following in the Footsteps of Ford: Mental Retardation and Capital Punishment Post-Atkins

Authors

  • Cynthia A. Orpen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2003.23

Abstract

Since the United States Supreme Court held the capital sentence of mentally retarded John Paul Penry to be constitutional in Penry v. Lynaugh, the relationship between capital punishment, mental retardation and the Eighth Amendment has been widely debated. In a long awaited opinion, the Court finally held that the Eighth Amendment categorically prohibits the execution of the mentally retarded. In Atkins v. Virginia, the Court overruled its holding in Penry, and recognized that capital sentences imposed on the mentally retarded constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Although this appears to be a victory for the mentally retarded and their advocates, the real effect of the decision will depend largely on how the states apply the Atkins holding.

Downloads

Published

2003-04-01

How to Cite

Orpen, Cynthia A. 2003. “Following in the Footsteps of Ford: Mental Retardation and Capital Punishment Post-Atkins”. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 65 (1). https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2003.23.

Issue

Section

Notes and Comment