Protecting the Right to Effective Assistance of Capital Postconviction Counsel: The Scope of the Constitutional Obligation to Monitor Counsel Performance

Authors

  • Celestine Richards McConville

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2005.34

Abstract

It is no secret that capital cases in the United States are far from error free. According to a recent study, the two most common errors in capital cases are “egregiously incompetent defense lawyering” and “prosecutorial suppression of evidence that the defendant is innocent or does not deserve the death penalty.” Other errors include inaccurate eyewitness testimony, perjured testimony, and false confessions, just to name a few. And, since 1973, no fewer than 117 capital inmates have been released from death row because errors such as these camouflaged their innocence.

Downloads

Published

2005-04-26

How to Cite

McConville, Celestine Richards. 2005. “Protecting the Right to Effective Assistance of Capital Postconviction Counsel: The Scope of the Constitutional Obligation to Monitor Counsel Performance”. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 66 (3). https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2005.34.

Issue

Section

Articles